Diskussion:Forside: Forskelle mellem versioner

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Versionen fra 2. sep. 2016, 00:05

Har studeret eksemplet med hund, men ih hvor jeg dog savner de begynder-sider der hjalp mig let og smertefrit i gang på Wikipedia...
Bl.a. savner jeg en forklaring på tallene i parenteserne, f.eks. (1.1)

(x.y) x=navneord, verbum, osv; y=betydning

se fx. Bar i den polske Wikiordbog (selv om du ikke forstår sproget, kan du læse eks. på eng/da/de og se hvordan det fungerer)

se også andre danske ord i PL - index
--tsca 3. maj 2004 kl. 22:20 (UTC)

Hit med lidt "begynderhjælp", så skal jeg gerne deltage...!

Peo, en skribent på den danske del af Wikipedia... :-)

Kan nogen forklare, hvorfor forsiden viser, at der er -1 ord i den danske ordbog. Så vidt jeg kan se, nærmer vi os da de første 10 ord? Sten Porse Den 8. maj 2004 kl. 12:19 CET

Lige nu fungerer tælleren kun i de "gamle" wikiordbøger (en, pl, fr).
--tsca 8. maj 2004 kl. 12:46 (UTC)

se Wiktionary Statistics - Danish
--tsca 23. maj 2004 kl. 17:56 (UTC)

tilføjelse af bøjningsendelser ved andre sprog? ~ eller -

En forsigtig debut - jeg har indføjet et par grønlandske oversættelser (gammelt bifag i eskimologi) - hvilke konventioner for tilføjelse af bøjningsendelser skal man bruge - opslagsordet føjer til med ~ , men i oversættelserne bruger nogen bindestreg?
--Ulla Sejrsen 29. jun 2004 kl. 23:01 (UTC)

http://ordnet.dk/ods/

Udseende

Er det kun mig der synes at det ville se bedre ud, hvis vi (ligesom man også kan på den danske Wikipedia) havde en søgefelt i midten.

(men alså kun på forsiden)

Søg efter en artikel

koden har jeg fra den svenske Wiktionary.

Jeg synes også det vil forbedre forsiden med et søgefelt. 80.161.48.65 22. okt 2006 kl. 07:32 (UTC)

Mangler der ikke en Latin ordbog?

Jeg har forgæves ledt efter en ordbog over det gamle sprog på nettet.

Jeg ser, at der i Wikibooks findes en bog over akkadisk, men ingen over latin.

Jeg mener, at det ville være relevant at have en ordbog over latin her i Wiktionary, da flere ord på forskellige europæiske sprog linguistisk hænger sammen med det "døde" sprog.

Jeg er ikke selv en ørn til latin - selvom jeg tog den lille latinprøve i folkeskolen, men er det muligt, at der blandt wikipedianerne ikke skulle være enkelte, der har mod på at lægge en ordbog over latin ind her?

Hilsen Ane S

Der er [1], [2] og [3]. Håber det er noget du kan bruge :-) Kinamand 21. nov 2007, 11:51 (UTC)

IRC #wiktionary-da

Can we create a new IRC channel for da.wikt ? Go in http://mibbit.com/chat, selection Freenode, so your name and the channel (#wiktionary-da). --Ilaria 18. dec 2008, 19:45 (UTC)

Ilaria har oprettet #wiktionary-da. – Leo Laursen (snak · bidrag) 30. dec 2008, 20:04 (UTC)

Ændring af layout

Jeg synes personligt at den danske Wiktionary's forside er en smule.. kedelig, så at sige.
Er der nogen der ville have noget imod, hvis jeg frisker den lidt op?
Jeg forestiller mig noget lidt i stil med den danske Wikipedia's forside, hvis dette er okay. (?)
~ Mads Ren`ai 4. feb 2009, 12:09 (UTC)

Det lyder da som en god ide. Glæder mig til at se resultatet :-) Kinamand 4. feb 2009, 12:59 (UTC)

Sådan. Håber at det ser nogenlunde ud. :-)

~ Mads Ren`ai 4. feb 2009, 14:23 (UTC)

Rigtige sprog/kunstsprog

Nuværende tekst: "Bemærk at kun rigtige sprog inkluderes dvs. ikke kunstsprog som klingon (fra Star Trek)."

"Alle sprog"-listen indeholder Esperanto og Volapyk. Politikken er åbenbart ikke at medtage FIKTIVE sprog. Under alle omstændigheder er "rigtige sprog" en unødig værdidom. Jeg retter.

Localise your wiki logo

The official localisable Wiktionary logo

Hello! It was noted that Wiktionary in this language has not yet adopted a localised/translated logo: it's really a pity for a dictionary project!
We are trying to help Wiktionaries adopt a locally-adapted logo, by taking the technical difficulties on us. What we need from you is just the preferred translation of the name and motto, "Wiktionary" (if translated) and "The free dictionary": you can add them to the logo list, by editing it directly or commenting on the talk page; you can also add a note if you don't want the localised logo.
Of course, you can also create the logo and make the necessary requests on bugzilla yourself, if you prefer so.
Feel free to translate this message and to move/copy/forward it where appropriate; you can also reply on my talk. Thanks, Nemo 3. nov 2012, 15:31 (UTC)

Localise your wiki logo

The official localisable Wiktionary logo

Hello! It was noted that Wiktionary in this language has not yet adopted a localised/translated logo: it's really a pity for a dictionary project!
We are trying to help Wiktionaries adopt a locally-adapted logo, by taking the technical difficulties on us. What we need from you is just the preferred translation of the name and motto, "Wiktionary" (if translated) and "The free dictionary": you can add them to the logo list, by editing it directly or commenting on the talk page; you can also add a note if you don't want the localised logo.
Of course, you can also create the logo and make the necessary requests on bugzilla yourself, if you prefer so.
Feel free to translate this message and to move/copy/forward it where appropriate; you can also reply on my talk. Thanks, Nemo 3. nov 2012, 15:56 (UTC)

Link til ordbogsopslag

Ang. denne tilføjelse: Der bør vel ikke være sådanne henvisninger fra Wiktionarys forside. Selvom forsiden ligger i hovednavnerummet ligesom ordbogsopslagene, er denne side trods alt ikke et ordbogsopslag.
- Sarrus (d • b) d. 19. jan 2015, 18:13 (UTC)

We really shouldn't have Forside in capital letters as our homepage title. There may be a word in some language where the capital Forside is an actual word and where we need an entry for it. So we should just merge this with Wiktionary:Forside. NativeCat (diskussion) 19. jan 2015, 18:15 (UTC)

Those pages should not be merged. They have each their function. Wiktionary:Forside is a page for the editors of this projects, while Forside is the front page of Wiktionary. Please do not make a problem that does not exist. Is there a language where the word Forside (and not forside) exists? The frontpage of Danish Wikipedia has the same name (w:Forside).
- Sarrus (d • b) d. 19. jan 2015, 18:20 (UTC)

Wikipedia is fine I guess, I'm not a big fan of Wikipedia. I'm just saying, I don't like things like this being in mainspace. I think ONLY entries for the dictionary should be in mainspace. It just doesn't seem right. One day there may be a Forside word in another language, and the non-existent page should treat it as if one day it could very well become a word. See en:Wiktionary:Main_Page, however I do not much support there being a en:Main Page mainspace redirect to this page. NativeCat (diskussion) 19. jan 2015, 18:26 (UTC)

If you click the logo in the upper left corner you are led to Forside, so if not the word Forside exists in any languages we do not have a problem right now. If the problem should occur once in the future the Wikimedia developers should chance the logo's link and move the frontpage. However: The name of the frontpage is not the issue of this discussion. That is about the link you added to a dictionary entry on the frontpage.
- Sarrus (d • b) d. 19. jan 2015, 18:39 (UTC)

What there ”may be one day” is a very hypothetical problem for the future, to be treated if and when it ever arises. As far as I am concerned NativeCat is talking nonsense, and I would like to see his ”Se også: forside” removed. --Olelog (diskussion) 19. jan 2015, 18:53 (UTC)

I agree with Sarrus and Olelog. As a side note, you could consider protecting the main page (I believe most wiki projects have the front page protected). -- Curious (diskussion) 20. jan 2015, 20:46 (UTC)

Wiktionary på latin: +10.000 artikelne

Dem Wiktionary på latin allerede tjener +10.000 artikelne på 27 marts 2016.

Lennart Josef Raimund (diskussion) 25. apr 2016, 01:49 (UTC)

Ahvaffornoed? Hvad faen prøver du at sige? Não utilizes o Google Translator a próxima vez, muito obrigado. A sério. Não posso te entender. --87.116.0.30 25. apr 2016, 17:41 (UTC)

"pantebrev"

Could someone please translate this to English? I think it means "mortgage deed" or "mortgage letter" but I can't be sure. There's no Wikipedia article on it, and I need it because I want it as a Wiktionary entry. Sources:

ordnet.dk "skrivelse der dokumenterer en kreditors sikkerhed for udlånte penge i form af ret til pant i fast ejendom eller i løsøre"

[4] "Et pantebrev er et lån ydet mod sikkerhed i fast ejendom. Med et pantebrev stiller ejeren sin ejendom som sikkerhed overfor en långiver, der så bliver panthaver."

[5] "Et pantebrev giver en långiver (f.eks. et realkreditinstitut eller en bank) sikkerhed for et lån i ejendommen."

pant = mortgage
brev I think = "letter" technically

Philmonte101 (diskussion) 16. jul 2016, 09:28 (CEST)

"mortgage deed" according to Gyldendals røde ordbøger Dansk-Engelsk.

Translating back from English "mortage deed" = "pantebrev" or "panteobligation" according to the larger dictionary Kjærulff Nielsen Engelsk Dansk Ordbog. --Olelog (diskussion) 16. jul 2016, 09:25 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Philmonte101 (diskussion) 16. jul 2016, 17:22 (UTC)

Skabelonshjælp

I need help with this template. Template:Fransk konjugationstabel 2-er-avoir, and probably others, need to be modified so that the tables use Danish words to describe the forms, but obviously have the verb forms in French. There should also be links to all of the forms listed, since theoretically, Wiktionary should have entries for every attestable word that is not SoP in every attestable language, including the forms. Philmonte101 (diskussion) 30. jul 2016, 11:09 (UTC)

English words needed on the Danish Wiktionary.

Hi. I wanted to let you guys know that I am compiling several lists of Danish terms that we do and don't have taken from several text sources, especially from the English Wiktionary. As the Danish Wiktionary, we should obviously and hypothetically include not just all lemma forms, but all non-lemma forms as well. See my user page for a list of these. This is what I'm currently basing many of my entries on. Right now, the Danish Wiktionary is doing well, but is seriously lacking in many areas. That's what I'm here to help the project with! Philmonte101 (diskussion) 5. aug 2016, 19:38 (UTC)

@@ Linje 147: / Linje 147: @@
 Hi. I wanted to let you guys know that I am compiling several lists of Danish terms that we do and don't have taken from several text sources, especially from the English Wiktionary. As the Danish Wiktionary, we should obviously and hypothetically include not just all lemma forms, but all non-lemma forms as well. See [[Bruger:Philmonte101|my user page]] for a list of these. This is what I'm currently basing many of my entries on. Right now, the Danish Wiktionary is doing well, but is seriously lacking in many areas. That's what I'm here to help the project with! [[Bruger:Philmonte101|Philmonte101]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Philmonte101|diskussion]]) 5. aug 2016, 19:38 (UTC)
-== Proposal for an extension to the Danish Wiktionary's policy on what is and isn't allowed here. ==
-My motive is from the false entry [[the American dream]] which everyone here is unfortunately defending. I am American and I am a native English speaker; they should be listening to me rather than treating my opinion on the matter as "vandalism".
-Anywho, in this example, the more common capitalization for the term is [[American Dream]], and adding "[[the]]" beforehand just makes it a sum-of-parts term, as you can find the definition for [[the]] separately from [[American Dream]].
-Please refer to the English Wiktionary's policy on SOPs, as follows:
-"An expression is idiomatic if its full meaning cannot be easily derived from the meaning of its separate components. Non-idiomatic expressions are called sum-of-parts (SOP).
-For example, '''this is a door''' is not idiomatic, but shut up and red herring are."
-We ''need'' official policy on this here. Let's have a vote. @[[User:Bedsten]], @[[User:First jumper]] [[Bruger:Philmonte101|Philmonte101]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Philmonte101|diskussion]]) 31. aug 2016, 11:31 (UTC)
-:The entry has a reference to http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/american where "the American dream" is mentioned as a phrase. Existing words and phrases should be allowed. At least if they are confirmed by a reliable source. And please remember, that this is not enwiktionary. <br /> - [[bruger:Sarrus|Sarrus]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Sarrus|d]] &bull; [[Speciel:Bidrag/Sarrus|b]])  d. 31. aug 2016, 14:07 (UTC)
-:: The fact that it is mentioned in Oxford doesn't make it any less SOP. Do you think we should have entries like [[green tree]] that literally just mean [[green]] + [[tree]]? It is the same thing here. "the" is just a modifier in this case. In English, we don't include "the" within a proper noun or a noun. For instance, instead of saying "I'm going to The United States", we'd say "I'm going to the United States." "the" at the beginning of a term is not generally a component of a proper noun ''or'' a common noun. Therefore, it's SOP. I wouldn't mind a redirect from [[the American Dream]] to [[American Dream]], but I'd like to keep [[American Dream]] as the lemma form.
-:: Anyway, enough about that entry. My point in this discussion is that we at dawiktionary need an official policy guideline about multiple-worded entries being sums of parts. We simply can't include things like [[green tree]], [[Danish king]], [[American worker]], etc., unless they have some idiomatic meaning besides [[green]] + [[tree]], [[Danish]] + [[king]], etc. [[Bruger:Philmonte101|Philmonte101]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Philmonte101|diskussion]]) 31. aug 2016, 20:24 (UTC)
-<span class="wp_boppel" style="color:red">[[Fil:Red x.svg|16px|✘|link=]]&nbsp;</span>'''neij''', ikke nødvendig. [[Bruger:Bedsten|Bedsten]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Bedsten|diskussion]]) 1. sep 2016, 06:40 (UTC)
-Denne her side hedder Diskussion:Forside og det er fordi den skal bruges til at diskutere hvad der skal stå på forsiden. Forslag til regler for hvad der skal være artikler om skal diskuteres på Landsbybrønden. [[Bruger:Kinamand|Kinamand]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Kinamand|diskussion]]) 1. sep 2016, 12:23 (UTC)